About Me

Innovative legal educator. Legal writing ninja. Law student study habits expert.

My priority is my students, how to best help them think and write, excel in law school, the bar exam, and law practice. I integrate scholarship on cognitive science, study skills, and teaching and learning with innovative teaching methods to modernize and revitalize legal education and law learning.

I care deeply about student learning. I have devoted years to becoming an expert on law student study habits and research-based effective study habits, skills, and strategies to better understand how law students study and to maximize law learning. I continue to develop innovative and modern teaching methods, leveraging video, online learning strategies, and active learning processes to modernize legal education and teach today’s students.

I joined the faculty of the University of Denver’s nationally ranked Lawyering Process Program in Fall 2018, where I teach Lawyering Process I and II to first year law students at Sturm College of Law. In 2023, I was appointed as the Hartje & Reese Chair of the Lawyering Process Program. I have also taught an online Legal Analysis course in Tulane University Law School’s Online Master of Jurisprudence in Labor and Employment Law, a 100% online master’s program since 2016.

Prior to teaching at DU, I was a Visiting Assistant Professor of Lawyering Skills at Seattle University School of Law, where I taught Legal Writing I and Legal Writing II in Seattle U’s Nationally Ranked Legal Writing Program. I am a member of the Legal Writing Institute (LWI), the Association of Legal Writing Directors (ALWD), and a founding member of the Association of Academic Support Educators (AASE). I regularly present at conferences on legal writing, law student study habits, academic support, legal skills development, and effective teaching methods. You can learn more about my comprehensive scholarship here.

My article, Smarter Law Study Habits: An Empirical Analysis of Law Learning Strategies and Relationship with Law GPA establishes a positive correlation between self-testing, retrieval practice, and elaborative strategies and law GPA, as well as a negative correlation between passive strategies like rereading and cramming without self-testing with law GPA. My article summarizing empirical research on study skills, habits, and attitudes and how it can be used by legal educators to maximize law school learning, Smarter Law Learning: Using Cognitive Science to Maximize Law Learningwas published in Volume 44 of the Capital University Law Review.

I received an LWI/ALWD/LexisNexis Grant for Scholarship for my work developing the Law Student Study Habits Survey with my research partner, Dr. Regan A.R. Gurung, an expert on study behaviors and the psychology of teaching and learning. We administered and compiled data from the Law Student Study Habits Survey.

My recent articles on the intersection of cognitive science and legal education include:

Recent presentations on teaching and learning in legal education include:

  • Teaching Race-Conscious Problems in LRW Using Real Cases, Rocky Mountain Legal Writing Conference, UNLV, February 25, 2023.
  • The Science of Legal Synthesis, Legal Writing Institute Biennial Conference, Georgetown Law Center, July 21, 2022.
  • Let Them Talk: Cognitive & Social Benefits of Elaboration, Nova Law Review and NSU Law Legal Research and Writing Symposium, February 26, 2021.
  • Let Them Talk: Cognitive Benefits of Elaboration, LWI One-Day Workshop, December 3, 2020.
  • Cognitive Science of Legal Synthesis, Legal Writing Institute Virtual Biennial, July 15, 2020.
  • Cognitive Science of Induction and Rule Synthesis, 19th Rocky Mountain Legal Writing Conference, UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law, March 15, 2019.
  • The Science of Successful Learning in the Legal Writing Classroom, 17th Biennial Conference of the Legal Writing Institute, Portland OR, July 13, 2016.
  • Empirical Findings from a Law Student Study Habits Survey: How Our Students Really Study and What Really Works, 2014 Biennial Conference of the Legal Writing Institute, Philadelphia, PA, July 2, 2014.
  • Analysis Tournament: Using Classroom Debate to Practice Inferential Analysis and Counter Argument with Karen Harkins, Association of Academic Support Educators, 2013 Inaugural Conference, UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law, May 29, 2013.
  • Play It Again Sam: Reinforcing Practice to Achieve Perfection, 15th Biennial Conference of the Legal Writing Institute, Palm Desert, California, May 30, 2012.
  • Developing a Law Student Study Behaviors Checklist: How Are They Really Studying and What Really Works? (Invited Presentation), Law School Admission Council Academic Support Program Training Workshop, “Beyond IRAC: The Cognitive and Emotional Aspects of Law Study and Practice,” University of Memphis, Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law, February 4, 2012.

Prior to law teaching, I defended persons accused of crimes in Washington State. As a former public defense attorney, I have years of experience defending hundreds of criminal cases. I have independently taken over 20 cases to trial in Washington State District and Superior courts and argued appeals both to the Superior Court and the Court of Appeals, Division One. I previously worked as an associate attorney with the Law Office of Zachary L. Fleet in Seattle, Washington. At the Snohomish County Public Defender Association in Everett, Washington. I also worked as a public defender for the cities of Shoreline and Lake Forest Park. During law school, I worked as a Rule 9 Intern with The Defender Association in Seattle, Washington. I was a judicial extern for The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman in the Western District of Washington.

I graduated magna cum laude from the Seattle University School of Law, home to one of the United States’ best Legal Writing programs . I was a Note & Comment Editor of the Seattle University Law Review. I am a member in good standing with the Washington State Bar Association, California State Bar Association (inactive), and the Colorado Bar Association.