<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jennifer M. Cooper &#187; &#187; conditions of release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jennifermcooper.com/tag/conditions-of-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jennifermcooper.com</link>
	<description>Innovative Legal Education In Academic Success &#38; Legal Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Urinalysis is warrantess search; Mandatory urine testing as condition of pretrial release is inappropriate as there is no evidence that it increases likelihood of appearance for court</title>
		<link>http://www.jennifermcooper.com/2008/09/02/urinalysis-is-warrantess-search-inappropriate-condition-of-pretrial-release/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jennifermcooper.com/2008/09/02/urinalysis-is-warrantess-search-inappropriate-condition-of-pretrial-release/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer M. Cooper]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditions of release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search & seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State v. Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UA's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jennifermcooper.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State v. Rose, Court of Appeals Division II, filed August 26, 2008. Ms. Rose was arraigned on drug charges relating to a marijuana grow operation. Ms. Rose&#8217;s only criminal history was a conviction for driving with a suspended license from 1989. She had no history of failing to appear for court and she had a [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jennifermcooper.com/2008/09/02/urinalysis-is-warrantess-search-inappropriate-condition-of-pretrial-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
